This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Copyright law is complex and fact-specific. If you have received a demand letter or believe you may be facing an infringement claim, consult a qualified intellectual property attorney.
You opened an envelope, or more likely an email, and saw a law firm name you did not recognize demanding money for an image on your website. The number probably landed somewhere between $750 and $2,500. Maybe higher. There is a deadline. There is a case number. It looks official because it is official.
Take a breath. For small publishers and independent site owners, receiving something like this can feel overwhelming at first. This is not the end of the world. But it does require your attention, and ignoring it is the one thing you absolutely cannot do.
The Real Cost of One Bad Image
AP and Getty run active enforcement programs. One unlicensed image. One letter. $1,250. No warning.
Who Higbee and Associates Is
Higbee and Associates is a copyright enforcement law firm. They represent photographers, stock agencies, wire services, and other rights holders who find their images published without a license. They use automated tools to crawl the web, match images against their clients’ catalogs, and generate demand letters at scale.
This is legal. It is also a legitimate business model. Their clients own the images. If your site published one without a license, the legal exposure is real regardless of how the image got there.
The letter you received is not a scam. It is also not automatically the final word on what you owe.
Why Your Site Got the Letter
The most common reason is simple: someone on your staff grabbed an image from a Google search, a wire service web page, or another publication and uploaded it to your CMS without checking the license. They were on deadline. It looked like a good photo. Nobody flagged it.
This happens at newsrooms every day. Editorial staff are not trying to steal images. They are trying to fill a story hole before the morning meeting. The gap between their intent and the legal reality is where these letters come from.
It is also worth knowing that many editors get caught by images they believed were free. Creative Commons licenses are not blanket permission. They carry conditions — attribution requirements, non-commercial restrictions, share-alike clauses — and violating those conditions creates the same exposure as using a fully unlicensed image. Even “free” images carry risk if you do not read the terms.
The second most common reason is that an image was properly licensed at some point and the license expired, or a contributor submitted an image they did not actually own the rights to. Either way, your site is holding the exposure.
What the Letter Is Asking For
Higbee demand letters typically ask for a settlement payment based on the fair market licensing value of the image, sometimes multiplied by a factor to account for the unlicensed use. The number is not random. It is calculated to be uncomfortable enough to prompt payment but low enough that fighting it costs more than settling.
To put it in context: the actual license for the image in question might have cost $20 to $50 on the open market. The demand you received is not the licensing fee. It is the enforcement premium on top of it. That gap is intentional and it is legal.
They will usually include a deadline, a case number, evidence of the image on your site (often a screenshot with metadata), and instructions for responding.
Is Your Site Exposed?
If your editors source images from anywhere other than a licensed library, you have exposure you have not measured yet. The letter comes later.
What You Should Do Right Now
Do not ignore it. Ignored demand letters become lawsuits. Lawsuits become judgments. A $1,250 settlement demand that you ignore can turn into a five-figure federal court judgment plus attorney fees. The Copyright Act allows for statutory damages up to $30,000 per willful infringement. You do not want to find out what willful means in a courtroom.
Do not respond in anger. Whatever you write back becomes part of the record. Keep it factual and measured, or better yet, let an attorney write it.
Take the image down immediately if it is still on your site. This does not admit liability, and it stops the meter from running on ongoing infringement. Do it now, before you do anything else.
Document everything. Screenshot the letter, the email, the image location, and any information you have about how the image was obtained. If a staff member can recall where they sourced it, get that in writing internally.
Consult an attorney before you respond. You do not need a large firm. You need someone who handles intellectual property or media law and can evaluate the specific claim. Many intellectual property attorneys offer fixed-fee initial consultations for demand-letter review. The cost of that call is almost certainly less than the cost of responding badly.
Is the Demand Negotiable?
Often, yes. Higbee and similar firms are in the settlement business. Their volume model depends on most recipients paying without a fight. If you have counsel, respond professionally, and demonstrate good faith, the number frequently moves. There is no guarantee, but the opening demand is rarely the final number.
Factors that can affect the outcome include whether the image was removed promptly, whether there was any commercial benefit to your use, whether your publication is a nonprofit or commercial entity, and the licensing history of the specific image.
None of this is legal advice. It is context for why the conversation with an attorney is worth having before you write a check.
The Harder Conversation
Here is what the letter does not tell you: there are probably other images on your site with the same problem.
If one image made it through without a license check, others did too. Higbee found this one because it was in their client’s catalog and their crawlers caught it. The ones they did not find are still sitting there, waiting for the next crawl, from the next firm, representing the next rights holder.
The settlement you pay today closes one exposure. It does not close the others.
The only way to get ahead of this is to change the workflow. Not the policy, the workflow. Policies get written, posted, and ignored. A workflow that flags a potential licensing problem before an image goes live is the thing that actually changes behavior, because it puts the friction in the right place.
Most copyright problems do not begin with bad intent. They begin with rushed workflows, unclear sourcing, and assumptions that nobody stopped to verify.
PhotoCheckWP is a WordPress plugin that does exactly that. When an editor uploads an image, it runs a reverse image search before the image can be inserted into content, surfaces any potential matches with source information, and requires an acknowledgment before the workflow continues. Every upload is logged. Nothing gets through silently.
It does not eliminate the problem. Nothing does. But it changes the math considerably, and it creates a documented record that your operation took reasonable steps, which matters if you ever end up in a dispute.
Stop the Next One Before It Starts
PhotoCheckWP checks every upload before it goes live. Seven days free. Your first 1,000 checks cost nothing.
Start your free trial.The Bottom Line
The firm that sent you this letter will send another one to someone else tomorrow. Some of those recipients will ignore it. Some will pay without asking any questions. A few will use it as the reason to finally fix the workflow.
Be in that last group.
The PhotoCheckWP Team writes about image copyright, editorial workflow, and the real cost of unlicensed images in digital publishing. We built this tool because we watched the problem happen from inside newsrooms — and because we paid for it ourselves.
Seven Days Free. No Credit Card Fumbling.
You just read about a $1,250 settlement letter. PhotoCheckWP is $9.99 a month. The math is not complicated.
Every image your team uploads gets checked automatically. Matches get flagged. Every decision gets logged. It runs silent while your team works.
Start Your Free Trial